A: In These Times's live blogging from Denver.
Q: What is the antidote to corporate media coverage of the Democratic National Convention?
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > June 9, 2004

No News is Bad News

By Joel Bleifuss

The Bush White House has turned hiding politically unpalatable—or embarrassing—information into an art form.

The list is long: The lies about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. The still-secret meetings of Dick Cheney’s energy task force. What exactly is going on in U.S.-run prisons in Afghanistan and Iraq.

And we would know more about Bush administration perfidy had Attorney General John Ashcroft in October 2001 not issued a memorandum directing all federal agencies to carefully scrutinize all Freedom of Information Act requests. In it he offered to support any agency’s decision not to release information as long as a legal basis for a refusal could be cited.

With FOIA requests languishing, the press has had to rely on leaks.

There are leaks about global warming, the planetary danger that the Bush administration would prefer you not consider. (See “Listen to the Canary” on page 14.)

Also recall June 2003, when someone in the EPA leaked White House edits of an EPA report on the state of the environment. The White House deleted the sentences in the report that referred to a 1999 study showing global temperatures had risen sharply. They also took out the evidence that connected global warming to the burning of fossil fuels like oil and gas, replacing it with information from a study financed by the American Petroleum Institute and Exxon-Mobil.

In the end, however, an unnamed official explained to the New York Times, the EPA decided to take out the whole section on global warming “to avoid criticism that they were selectively filtering science to suit policy.”

Then there are leaks about how the administration selectively favors friends. Time recently obtained a copy of the March 5, 2003, internal Pentagon e-mail in which an Army Corps of Engineers official explained that Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former employer, was set to receive a contract to get the oil flowing in Iraq. According to the e-mail, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith arranged approval of the contract, part of a program known as Restore Iraqi Oil. The Army Corps official wrote that the contract is “contingent on informing WH [White House] tomorrow. We anticipate no issues since action has been coordinated w[ith] VP’s office.” That coordinated action netted Halliburton a multi-billion-dollar contract.

And there are leaks that reveal how compassionate this conservative administration is not. At the Washington Post, an Office of Management and Budget memorandum recently came over the transom. It instructed all government agencies that run domestic programs to cut their 2006 budgets by proscribed amounts. “The cuts are politically sensitive,” reports the Post’s Jonathan Weisman, “targeting popular programs that Bush has been touting on the campaign trail.” Destined for the chopping block, should Bush be reelected, are the Education Department, a nutrition program for women, infants and children (WIC), Head Start, and homeownership, job-training, medical research and science programs. For example, Head Start, which helps improve the educational success of poor children, is slated for a $177 million (2.5 percent) budget cut in 2006.

These domestic programs that benefit the poor and middle class must be cut, of course, because the administration needs to make up for the loss in federal revenue created by the Bush tax cuts.

Exactly how much richer the rich are getting thanks those cuts is hard to know, because someone in the White House has instructed the Treasury Department to stop releasing to the public data on how the tax cuts are distributed by income level.

Syndicated columnist Paul Krugman observed: “Of course, voters would never support this agenda if they understood it. That’s why dishonesty … is such a central feature of the White House political strategy.”

That’s the strategy. Here’s the motto: “What you don’t know can’t hurt us.”

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the “10 Most Censored Stories” than any other journalist.

More information about Joel Bleifuss

  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Add to the list of deceptions:

    1) Bushmen Winning Terror War http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=12&u;=/ap/20040611 1/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/powell_terror_report

    WASHINGTON - The State Department acknowledged Thursday it was wrong in reporting terrorism declined worldwide last year, a finding used to boost one of President Bush’s chief foreign policy claims ó success in countering terror.
    Instead, both the number of incidents and the toll in victims increased sharply, the department said. Statements by senior administration officials claiming success were based “on the facts as we had them at the time. The facts that we had were wrong,” department spokesman Richard Boucher said.

    2) Colin Powell’s and Toxic Stormin’ Norman’s
    “Friendly Footprint” statistics--66% US casualty rate from GW1.

    http://www.va.gov/vetdata/ProgramStatics/

    13.Disability/Degree of Impairment and Type of Major Disability by Period of Service, September 30, 2002 (COMPENSATION)

    Gulf War....(Vets) 419.120
    (Monthly cost) $182.554.000

    3) CENTCOM log on WMD
    http://www.gulfwarvets.com/gulflink/950719bh.txt

    1.A.2. IRAQI CW AGENT CAPABILITY BY TYPE AND QUANTITY.
    ANSWER:  DURING DESERT STORM, 90 OF IRAQ’S KNOWN CW
    PRODUCTION CAPABILITY WAS DESTROYED, INCLUDING IT’S INDIGENOUS
    PRECURSOR PRODUCTION CAPABILITY. IRAQ’S CURRENT PRODUCTION
    CAPABILITY IS APPROXIMATELY 180-240 TONS PER YEAR, PROVIDED THEY
    CAN GET PRECURSORS AND ADEQUATE ELECTRICAL POWER. THE AGENTS OF
    CHOICE ARE SULFUR MUSTARD AND THE NERVE AGENT SARIN. WE ALSO
    ASSESS IRAQ TO HAVE SMALL AMOUNTS OF THE NERVE AGENTS GF, AND VX.
    ALTERNATE PRODUCTION SITES IN POST DESERT STORM IRAQ HAVE NOT YET
    BEEN IDENTIFIED. WE DO NOT EXPECT IRAQ, HOWEVER, TO ACTIVELY
    PRODUCE CW AGENT OR MUNITIONS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

    4-7) GW2 casualties, radiation risks, etc.

    http://www.deploymenthealth.mil/508/about_dhcc.asp

    Returning Soldiers Do Not Have Dangerous DU Radiation Levels Officials Say

    G.I.s Press Army for Uranium Test

    Warning of Uranium Contamination Risks to NGO Staff, Coalition Forces, Foreign Contract Personnel and Civilians in Iraq

    Military Use of Fabric Made With Toxin Questioned

    Medical Evacuations in Iraq War Hit 18,000

    Posted by Peter Glaser on Jun 11, 2004 at 4:26 AM

  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
     

    Retreive lost password »

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues

Also by Joel Bleifuss

Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions