Read Senior Editor Laura Washington's 8 reasons to make a tax-deductible donation to In These Times.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > December 18, 2007

Beware the Credit-Industrial Complex

Barely regulated banks are getting away with one usurious practice after the next: not only the subprime fiasco, but the extortionate service fees on your bank accounts and the escalating interest fees, late fees and truncated payment cycles on your credit cards

By Susan J. Douglas

Designed to protect creditors, the bankruptcy 'reform' act makes it harder and more expensive to actually declare bankruptcy.
Tags   

My daughter is a freshman in college and is learning a lot, including how to manage her money. Recently, she got a powerful initiation into the predatory practices of banks—a lesson more and more of us are learning each month. She made a miscalculation and thought she had more in her account than she did. When she went to make a withdrawal from an ATM machine, the bank let her, even though she was in deficit. Comerica bank continued to let her make such withdrawals, and charged her $32 a pop for doing so. A $4 charge at a coffee shop became a $36 charge with the fee. A $6 sandwich became $38. She had never authorized the bank to permit deficit spending. And she, like most people, had no idea that the bank would still let her use her card if she was broke. The bank doesn’t tell you it will do this. Why? Because it’s a huge source of profit for them.

BusinessWeek reported on a student whose bank, Pittsburgh’s PNC, allowed him to charge $230 on his debit card even though his account was in the hole. PNC charged him $217 in fees for the privilege. A PNC spokesperson says such a policy “helps our customers avoid embarrassment.” The student said he would rather have been embarrassed than gouged.

In 2004, banks pocketed $32 billion in service fees, up from $21 billion in 1999. According to BusinessWeek, such fees accounted for 76 percent of profits at the Midwestern bank, TCF. Wells Fargo in San Francisco reportedly charges $2 every time someone with a low balance calls a service representative, and a whopping $30 an hour when a rep helps someone reconcile an account. Not surprisingly, the majority of these fees falls upon the poorest customers.

One out of five customers switches banks because he or she is so outraged by these charges. One estimate by Gartner Research shows that it costs banks less than 50 cents to return a payment request, while turning around and charging us anywhere from $25 to $40 for this “service.”

The barely regulated banks are getting away with one usurious practice after the next: In addition to the subprime fiasco now threatening the entire economy, there are the extortionate service fees on your bank accounts and the escalating interest fees, late fees and truncated payment cycles on your credit cards. Millions of us now get credit card bills that give us 10 days—and those aren’t 10 business days—to pay up or get hit with a late fee. No wonder the credit card industry has been one of the most profitable in the country, earning on the order of $30 billion annually. The rates credit card companies charge retailers have gone up 85 percent since 2001, and those are passed onto us.

In 2005, Congress passed the infamous bankruptcy “reform” act after major lobbying by the financial-industrial complex, adding to the enormous pressure many people are feeling from the mortgage-housing-credit crisis. Designed to protect creditors, the law makes it harder and more expensive to declare bankruptcy.

It used to be that people in financial trouble could file under Chapter 7, which typically allowed them to keep their homes while other property was sold off to help cover credit card and medical debts. What pissed off the banks was that, after flooding everyone with offers to acquire even more credit cards, some of this debt would get massively reduced or written off under the old law.

The new law forces people to file under Chapter 13, which requires them to accept a 3- to 5-year repayment plan on all debt. This may lead to even more foreclosures. And for those who still can use Chapter 7, it now costs twice as much to file as it used to. While many conservatives blame individuals for charging and borrowing irresponsibly, one of the major causes of going into such debt are the huge medical bills racked up by those without health insurance.

You also can’t renegotiate mortgages in bankruptcy court. Reps. Brad Miller (D-N.C.), Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and others have introduced a bill that would allow bankruptcy courts to do this, but lobbyists for the banking industry are already working to scotch this. As Chris Hayes advocated recently online at The Nation, “the long-term challenge” is to regulate this industry. Hayes also reported that “Blue Dog” Democrats—the coalition of moderate-to-conservative Dems who vote with Bush Republicans—urged House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) to delay the Miller-Frank bill. This despite the fact that foreclosure rates continue to zoom, in some places two to four times what they were this time last year.

What the Democrats ought to do during their next trips back to their districts is just ask constituents what they think of their credit card companies, their banks and their mortgage companies. What they might hear is that these are some of the leeches people want pulled off of the body politic immediately.

Susan J. Douglas is a professor of communications at the University of Michigan and author of The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women.

More information about Susan J. Douglas
Tags   
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Is it surprising that banks continue to add even more devious ways to make a buck if only 20 percent of the customers getting screwed leave them?  After 23 years with my neighborhood bank they announced over the speaker, “We can’t accept this check.”
    With no prior notice it seems our long standing agreement for my one person business to have a single integrated personal/business account had been modified. First I was told by an officer it was “the law” — baloney! I insisted on talking with the bank manager who confirmed it was a change in their policy.
    The new fees to my business deposits would include a much bigger one for writing each check, a monthly maintenance fee, AND a fee for putting money INTO the account. I suggested he check their records to see if my patronage was making money for them or costing them and get back to me.
    His offer a few days later was to continue as we had done for over two decades with the exception that they would pay no interest on my money. Fortunately by that time I had found another place which paid better interest, made no distinction between personal and business deposits and I have been better off with them over fifteen years.
    What the bank will never know is just how many people I have steered away from them and toward the other service.
    ----------------------
    The personal we can do something about — the current subprime scam is not being classed as a crime and will go unpunished except for those victims who choose to sue. I understand a number of Australians burned by Lehman (including a charitable organization) is going to do just that.
    Our elected officials, the rating agencies, and the financial CEOs are not only getting away with $billions, some are leaving with additional $millions even when “fired.” The Fed and Treasury Dept. are passing the hat (our hat) asking for money to cover the crimes.
    Typically, my letter to my “representative” received a — Thank You for Your Interest:— reply and promised congress would pass legislation to make such “misjudgments” less likely in the future.
    I’ll stick with my own philosophy — You only have to shoot the first one!

    Posted by whattheheck on Dec 18, 2007 at 7:53 AM

    re:  Foreclosure Fraud, FREDDIE MAC, Well Fargo, Judicial Corruption

    Any representation to Wall Street Investors by FREDDIE MAC or by WELLS FARGO that its reported $$$ billion dollar losses are due to people defaulting on their mortgages should be weighed against the fact that (in states such as Louisiana), Freddie Mac and Wells Fargo needlessly pays DEBT COLLECTION firms outrageous legal fees for corporate lawyers to outmaneuver –and even persecute people who file court proceedings in opposition to fraudulent foreclosures.  In Louisiana, Wells Fargo and FREDDIE MAC are 2 mortgage companies which benefit from fraudulent foreclosures and entrenched real estate and mortgage fraud racketeering schemes.  Also, in lawsuits for “Unfair Debt Collection” damages, collectors get to make more $$ via litigation, along with co-conspirators who enjoy pieces of the foreclosure pie. But thanks to federal authorities such as U.S. Attorney Jim Letten and U.S. Attorney David Dugas, real estate racketeers in Louisiana have nothing to worry about. Verification of what I have written is posted on my www.lawgrace.org website.

    =======================================================
    *Also, posted on NEWSBLAZE.COM, see this article: “Mortgage Mess, Foreclosure Fraud and Impediments to Justice:”

    Most critical to the Foreclosure Crisis is FORECLOSURE FRAUD, which enables MORTGAGE LENDERS to ILLEGALLY FLIP properties. In Louisiana, 2 particular mortgage companies which benefit from fraudulent foreclosures are Wells Fargo and FREDDIE MAC! It is HIGHLY COMMON for a DEBT COLLECTOR attorney to file a foreclosure: (i) in the name of a DEFUNCT mortgage company;(ii) in the name of a mortgage company which is NO LONGER holder of the security interest (the promissory note); or (iii) file a foreclosure and AFFIX a “ransom” amount (the collector’s fee) far exceeding what the promissory note “Acceleration Clause” authorizes.

    Despite a property owner’s entitlement to Challenge CONTRARY-TO-LAW loss of his / her home, most property owners LACK consumer and legal knowledge; the Court System is REFRACTORY; and there are limited attorneys with acumen to pursue Consumer Law. Also, when borrowers sue for “Unfair Debt Collection Practices,” damages, the collector gets to make more $$ through prolonged litigation, as co-conspirators enjoy the foreclosure pie.

    Investors need to become more astute about how mortgage servicers’ misdeeds hurts borrowers as well as siphons incalculable amounts of money from what Investors should reap. (See “Limiting Abuse and Opportunism By Mortgage Servicers,” AND “Private Property Rights Deferred: Has Predatory Mortgage Servicing Destroyed The American Dream” by Rawle Andrews, Jr., Esq.,and Leroy Jones, Jr., J.D. Visit: http://www.msfraud.org/index.html.)

    http://newsblaze.com/story/20071203130614tsop.nb/newsblaze/TOPSTORY/Top-Stories.
    ====================================================================

    **also see:
    “ILLEGAL REAL ESTATE FLIPPING...”
    http://www.lawgrace.org/2007/06/21/illegal-real-estate-flipping-unfair-enrichmen nt-etc/

    ====================================================================
    Barbara Ann Jackson
    Law & Grace, Inc.
    www.lawgrace.org
    LOUISIANA

    Posted by BarbaraAnnJackson on Dec 18, 2007 at 4:03 PM

    “A PNC spokesperson says such a policy ‘helps our customers avoid embarrassment.’ “

    Is that some kind of a joke?  Is their business supposed to be comically corrupt?  The swindled should merely accept this tongue in cheek, wink and nod to the obvious swindle? 

    Think of a world where the consumer has power.  A world of consumers that reacts to a $217 overdraft scheme by pulling all of their accounts with that bank.  No shortage of banks in Pittsburg, I’m guessing. 

    Unfortunately, in these times, the consumer is broken from the power of their consumption.  There is no consumers union; it’s bad for business.

    Posted by CornChip on Dec 18, 2007 at 7:47 PM

    This article doesn’t explain why the normal processes of capitalism do not commodify bank services, that is, tend to drive down prices and drive up the quality of the product.  Nor does it explain why people cannot obtain better terms for themselves by forming their own banks (credit unions) cooperatively.  Instead, it seems to call for more regulation.  As we already have a great deal of government regulation of the banking industry, I suspect the answers to these questions have something to do with that very regulation.  And that as usual, begging the rich who own and operate the government to be nicer to us isn’t going to accomplish very much.

    Posted by anarcissie on Dec 21, 2007 at 7:58 AM

    Anarcissie,

    I believe you hit it with the idea that the regulations have much to do with the examples given in the article.

    People do have choices — not all banks are the same. Today banks are faced with similar problems as other businesses. The internet makes it possible to be under-cut just as Amazon and Wal-Mart do to the neighborhood stores. They have been increasing fees and cutting staff/services for some time now. The major banks send their “back room” work to India.

    People need to be more watchful and skeptical concerning where they park their money. Read the fine print! See if it is FDIC insured. See if the bank can delay withdrawals on your money.

    NOBODY cares about your money like you do.

    It is the biggest banks which have the ear of Wall St. and Congress. They are receiving full cooperation in delaying disclosure of just how bad the subprime mess is. The fund proposed by the government is to sell more SIVs to fund those SIVs (Special Investment Vehicles) which were tainted. The real seriousness involved here is not that banks now fear lending — it is they don’t have the funds to cover the shortfall created by the deflating of the mortgage pricing to whatever the real market value may be.

    Deregulation made the savings and loan mess possible a few years ago and the subprime was blessed form on high by Sir Alan Greenspan, ignored (?) by oversight committees and christened by the ratings agencies. This is a AAA scam which made a lot of individuals a lot of money and they will get to keep it.

    This is not new — where there are large sums there is a big opportunity for the greedy. President Andrew Jackson shut down the first federal banking system for unethical practices. 200 years ago.

    Posted by whattheheck on Dec 23, 2007 at 7:52 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 8 posts.

Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions